They gave you a mandate. They didn't give you new budget. Or a dedicated team. Or a definition of what "AI-ready" actually means.
Agent traffic surged nearly 8,000% last year. AI-driven purchases hit $67 billion during Cyber Week. Your competitor's site already works for agents. Your prospect's AI already chose a vendor. And it probably wasn't you.
AX Testing tells you exactly where your site breaks for AI agents. So you can fix it, and lead the conversation.
See how your site performs →No sales call. Results in 2 business days.
You could spend weeks researching WebMCP, accessibility trees, and structured data. And still not know if your actual site works for actual agents.
You don't need another whitepaper. You don't need another "AI strategy" deck. You need an answer. Something you can put in front of your team, or your boss, that says: here's where we stand. Here's what to fix. Here's how we lead on this.
The low-hanging fruit is there. Every week you wait is a week someone else grabs it. Be the one who acts first.
You give us a task for an AI agent to complete on your site. We handle everything else.
Eleven runs so you're not making decisions from a single data point. Report in CIF format, aligned with ISO/IEC 25062 and 25066. Written by Dr. Llewyn Paine, a researcher with over 15 years in UX.
A real person, not a language model. Someone who can tell the difference between a genuine issue and a statistical fluke. Agent testing is too new for a standardized playbook; right now, you need human judgment.
Every finding includes three things: what the agent couldn't do, why it failed, and exactly what to change. No vague suggestions. No "consider investigating further." Specific. Actionable. Hand it to your team and they'll know what to do.
"Need to consider and design for agent experience at the point of first engagement."
Workshop participant
Full session recording included. Watch the agent navigate your site in real time. See where it hesitates. Where it gets stuck. Where it panics and searches the web for an alternative, because your site blocked it.
The video shows your engineers what's happening in 30 seconds. It proves the problem is real. It creates the buy-in to fix it.
The report tells them why it's happening, and exactly what to change. That's the part you can't get from the video alone. Diagnosing agent failures takes infrastructure and expertise most teams don't have in-house. That's why we write the report.
"I fully intend to send this video over to the engineering people and say, hey, look."
Workshop participant
Most PMs handed an AI-readiness mandate are stuck. They don't know what to test. They don't have the infrastructure. They don't have budget they can use for this. So they wait.
You don't have to.
We've seen major hotel sites timing out agents. Restaurants blocking agents from seeing local menus. Contact forms that trap agents in endless retype loops. These aren't edge cases. They're what happens when nobody tests.
The report gives you something no whitepaper can: evidence from your actual site. Tactical fixes your team can implement this week. Strategic questions worth raising with leadership.
You stop being the person responsible for an undefined mandate. You become the person with the data, the findings, and the plan.
"This is how you demonstrate AI leadership. Not with empty productivity metrics. Not with another slide deck about 'the AI opportunity.' With measurable impact on how your site performs for the users of tomorrow."
"What if I pick the wrong task? What if the report doesn't find anything? What if this is just another thing I don't have time for?"
You're not the first PM handed an AI mandate with no new resources. 41% of business leaders say their organization lacks a clear AI strategy. Most of your peers are figuring this out as they go.
Here's what actually happens.
you have evidence. A video. A report. Specific failures with specific fixes. That's your case for going deeper, for a Top Tasks + Top Agents engagement that covers your full matrix of tasks, agents, and interaction modes.
→ One failure opens the door to a real investment.
you've learned something important: that task works for that agent. But it's one task. One agent. Your site has dozens of top tasks. The agent landscape spans every major LLM, every harness, every mode of interaction.
→ The approach works. Now you scale it.
Either way, you know more than you did. Either way, you have something real to show. And you don't need to learn anything first. You provide a task. If you're not sure what to test, we'll suggest one based on what we've seen break across hundreds of agent runs.
"I don't have a $15,000 testing budget. I can't sit through a two-week enterprise sales gauntlet. I need something I can buy today."
Traditional usability testing starts at $15,000 a year. UserTesting requires a sales process that can drag on for weeks before you even see a number.
AI-only testing tools are cheaper. They also give you AI-generated reports: agreeable, conflict-free, and exactly the kind of shallow feedback that makes products fail. We do the opposite. AI agents do the testing. A human expert writes the report. You get the speed of AI with the judgment of a researcher who knows what a real problem looks like.
Session recording included. CIF-format report included. No surprise fees. No credits that expire. No "talk to sales to see pricing."
Need to go deeper? Top Tasks + Top Agents is a full consulting engagement. Custom-scoped. Hundreds of test runs across multiple agents. A comprehensive report that covers every task that matters. Pricing is customized, but start with one test. See the value. Then decide.
$599. Self-service. No sales call.
Perfect for you if you've been told to "make the site AI-ready," and you need something real to show for it.
Includes: Full session recording. CIF-format report written by Dr. Llewyn Paine. Eleven runs. Specific fixes, not vague advice. Delivered within two business days.
"I fully intend to send this video over to the engineering people."
Workshop participant