Your boss asked about AI readiness. You need something you can buy on a credit card and put in front of her by Friday. No requisition. No approval chain. Not a slide deck. Not a whitepaper. Something real.
You tell us the task, the way a real user would ask for it. We do the rest. We select the agent. We run the task eleven times on your live site, and we record it. Then a real person sits down, watches what happened, and writes the report. Not a language model generating something agreeable. A human. CIF format. ISO/IEC 25062 and 25066.
Two days later, you open an email. Inside: a video you can watch right now, and a report you can hand to your boss without flinching. No AI-generated summary that sounds right but might be fiction. No article you found at midnight and hoped she wouldn't notice. Evidence.
No sales call. Results in 2 business days.
Agents don't wait for your roadmap. Right now, this minute, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity are on your site, or trying to be. They're not filling out forms yet. They're hitting gates you forgot you had.
Most teams have WAFs, bot detection, rate limiting. These were built to stop scrapers and spam. They also stop legitimate AI agents, silently. No alert in your dashboard. No log entry that reads "GPTBot blocked." Just a blank where a customer should have been. No error. Just silence.
Your competitor figures this out first? Their site opens the door. Yours stays invisible. "Your site either works for them, or it doesn't exist in their world."
Your boss might forget. The agents won't.
"We didn't critically test the platform."
"We didn't critically test the platform! The job we were supposed to have done was now being done by the people we reached out to. Here is one of the replies we got from a blogger. We were very embarrassed."
Tobi Ogunwande, Founder
Most websites score under 45. Find out where you stand.
Most sites score under 45. Two days, and you'll know.
Most AI testing tools hand you a paragraph. It reads well. It uses words like "suboptimal" and "friction points." It tells you the site is mostly fine, maybe a few minor issues. It's agreeable, because language models are trained to agree, not to find problems. You read it and feel nothing. No confidence. No evidence. Just words. And you're no closer to an answer.
That's not a report. That's a guess with formatting.
With One Task + One Agent, a real person watches your agent session. They see what happened: the hesitation, the blocked request, the form field the agent couldn't click. They write the findings in clear language. You get a recording of the run. Eleven attempts, one representative video delivered, the rest available. CIF format. ISO/IEC 25062 and 25066.
You don't summarize the tool's opinion in your next meeting. You open the video. You press play. And you don't have to say a word.
"I don't believe the tool output."
"I literally don't believe the tool output. How do I know you're not making this up? If you could put a webcam on the AI, like a user test recording, then maybe."
Senior PM, HN
"If no real users were involved, that statement becomes misleading."
"The most dangerous failure mode is not bad feedback. It is organizational overconfidence. 'We ran usability testing.' If no real users were involved, that statement becomes misleading."
Christine Schilling, UX professional
Written by a real person. CIF format. ISO/IEC.
Your current path, if you even have one: Google "AI readiness testing" at 10 PM. Open six tabs. Read about enterprise platforms with no pricing. Fill out a demo request. Wait. Or ask engineering, who will need to build observability from scratch, write custom code to capture agent sessions, and interpret raw logs. Weeks of work for a team that already has a roadmap.
One Task + One Agent is the path that doesn't ask for a team. You give us the task. We pick the agent. We run it eleven times on your site, record it, and a human analyzes what happened. $599. Credit card. Two days.
You're not building a lab. You're using ours. We built the agent infrastructure so you don't spend a sprint on it.
"AI is not intelligent."
"AI is not intelligent. AI is not intelligent. AI is not intelligent. You need actual humans testing your app. Only humans think like humans. LLMs don't think."
mubou, HN(We don't agree with the full thrust, but the intensity shows why human-written analysis matters.)
No infrastructure. No setup. Credit card.
You've read this far. You probably have specific questions. Here are the answers, no demo, no sales deck, no "let's hop on a quick call."
A human-written analysis: pass/fail determination, detailed break points if the agent failed, behavioral observations, and recommendations. Delivered in CIF format, adhering to ISO/IEC 25062 and 25066. You also receive a representative session recording.
We run eleven sessions and deliver one representative recording with the report. The full technical data for all eleven runs is available on request, no extra charge.
You exhale. That task works for that agent. It's not a clean bill of health for your whole site, but it's a win you can show. And it proves the approach. When you're ready to scale, Top Tasks + Top Agents covers your full agent surface. You've just made that conversation a lot easier.
You just found a real problem before it found you. The report shows exactly where the agent broke, why, and what to fix. You walk into your next meeting with a list, not a shrug.
You tell us the task, however your users would think about it or prompt for it. We select the right agent. If you're not sure what task to test, we'll recommend one based on what we've seen across sites like yours.
Yes. No hidden fees. No procurement. Credit card. If you need an invoice for reimbursement, we'll provide one. The price is on the page because it's a real product, not a negotiation.
$599. One task. One agent. One human-written report. Two business days. No surprises.