You've seen the case for agent-readiness. Now you need the full picture, one you can present to leadership without a single asterisk.
Top Tasks + Top Agents is a custom-scoped consulting engagement. We sit down with you and map the tasks your users need to accomplish. Then we test them across the models, harnesses, and interaction styles that actually reach your site. Hundreds of runs. Every way an agent can misunderstand your product, checked.
The scope scales to your task list. The price reflects the scope. You'll know both before you commit a dollar.
A real person writes every finding. A real person presents them. When the follow-up questions come, and they will, you won't be guessing. You'll have answers that hold up. Not an AI summary that nodded along and told you what you wanted to hear.
No commitment, no waiting weeks for a price.
AI agents, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, are already crawling your site. They're searching for products. Comparing options. Making decisions on behalf of your users.
An agent lands on your site. It tries to complete a task. It fails. That visitor, and every visitor that agent represents, is gone.
You won't see the drop. It'll look like a gradual decline in traffic you can't explain. You'll wonder why traffic softened. You'll check campaigns. Check SEO. But the agents will have already moved on to your competitors.
The question isn't whether agents will judge your site. They already are.
"Agent traffic won't wait for your roadmap."
"The gap between 'agent-ready' and 'agent-invisible' sites is about to become very visible in your analytics. The sites that prepare now will capture agent-driven traffic from day one. Everyone else will scramble to catch up."
Bill, AI Agent Economy co-founder
"Your site either works for them, or it doesn't exist in their world."
Siteline.ai, quoting Google's Liz Reid
The call is 30 minutes. The gap doesn't pause while you decide.
Right now, that question lands like a rock in your stomach. You know it's coming. You don't have a clean answer, not one you'd stake your reputation on.
Now picture the meeting, three weeks after your report lands.
You open with a single slide: a heatmap of your top tasks, tested across the models and interaction styles that actually reach your site. Red where agents failed. Green where they succeeded. A heatmap they can read in five seconds. A clear, visual story that tells the room: we know exactly where we stand, and we know exactly what to do next. You don't bury them in methodology. You lead with the answer.
When the sharp questions come after the presentation, and they will, you don't deflect. You don't promise to circle back. You answer them. Because the person who wrote the report is the same person presenting it, and they've already briefed you on every finding.
You leave the meeting with a mandate and a budget, not a homework assignment.
From "I hope it works" to "I know it works."
"We shipped a site we thought was solid. AX Testing showed us agents were failing on three of our six core tasks. We fixed them. Now when I'm asked about AI readiness, I'm not hoping, I'm showing data."
VP Product
"The most dangerous failure mode is organizational overconfidence."
"'We ran usability testing.' If no real users were involved, that statement becomes misleading. A human-written report based on real agent tests gives you actual confidence, not false comfort."
Christine Schilling, UX professional
You don't need to become the expert. You just need to make the call.
You could assign this to your internal team. They're capable. But agent testing isn't their field, yet. Learning on your timeline takes months. While the gap widens.
You could hire a big consultancy. Endless scoping calls. A junior partner who's never run an agent test. A six-figure invoice before you see a single finding.
Top Tasks + Top Agents is the alternative. We've already built the methodology. A real expert scopes, runs, and interprets every test. A real expert presents the findings. We've done this before, for sites that thought they were fine and weren't.
Fixed price. Half up front, half on delivery. If your organization requires vendor onboarding, we'll work through it, but you'll have a scope and a price in hand before that process starts.
"Spent two weeks in a sales process before I got an actual quote."
"The whole process of getting to a number felt deliberately designed to wear you down before you could comparison shop."
UserTesting prospect
"The AI personas produced sycophantic feedback, agreeable, positive, conflict-free."
"Exactly the kind of feedback that makes products fail because it tells you what you want to hear instead of what you need to know."
Marcus Völkel, QUALLEE
Fixed price. No upsells. No surprise add-ons after SOW.
We talk about your product, your top tasks, what you know about your users, and your current AI exposure. No commitment. No pitch deck. After the call, you decide whether to proceed. There's no soft pressure. No follow-up sequence. No "checking in" emails.
We send a scope of work that covers your task matrix, the models and interaction styles we'll test, and a fixed price. You see exactly what's being tested, how long it takes, and what it costs. No surprises later. Half up front, half on delivery.
We write the prompts. We run hundreds of individual tests across your full matrix. You don't lift a finger. You don't learn to write prompts for testing harnesses. You don't spend nights reading about vector embeddings.
You get a written report you can circulate to your team, plus a live presentation where we walk through every finding and answer questions. A real person. Not an AI summary.
Custom-scoped, based on your task list and the models and styles we test. You'll know the number before you sign.
Weeks, not months, from signed SOW to presentation.
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and more, matched to the ones that matter for your product.
They'll be answered naturally as we scope your engagement.
You'll leave the call with either clarity or a scope, both are useful.